Published
for the Fort Bliss/El Paso, Texas Community
January
13, 2005
3-43 field tests
Air and Missile Defense Training Concept
Story and Photos by Spc. Joshua Fender, 3-43 ADA Bde.
Spc. Scott Vazquez
watches the roadside for any suspicious movement or vehicles from the
OPFOR.
“Ground attack,
ground attack! Everyone to their fighting positions!” shouts the
“giant voice” just as an overhead flare erupts, illuminating
the night sky and everything within the Headquarters and 516th Company
site. |
“OPFOR (Opposition Forces) spotted in sector 5,” says the
Sergeant of the Guard over a hand-held walkie-talkie to the Soldiers
in position providing perimeter security. Shots are exchanged, and the
threat suppressed as intelligence reports five enemy casualties.
Scenarios such as these occurred on a regular basis during the post’s
first Air and Missile Defense Training Concept, field-tested by the
3rd Battalion, 43rd Air Defense Artillery. The AMDTC is comparable to
the National Training Center and Joint RTC and a rotational exercise
giving a Patriot battalion a standard to assess its training by using
wartime scenarios such as: hostile convoy operations, ground attacks,
air battles (ranging from reticule aim level seven to eleven), chemical
environments, and a Patriot live-fire.
Soldiers prepare logistics packages to distribute to remote batteries.
Convoy operations for the battalion began with a battalion-wide movement
(to mask movement) from armistice locations to their war-fighting locations
once the threat of Surface-to-Air Missile (possibly armed with chemical
warheads) attack became apparent. To increase force protection, the
978th Military Police Co. provided route reconnaissance and escorted
the batteries during the convoy operation.
For eight days the battalion faced a myriad of scenarios overseen by
the Edge Research and Development Company and augmented by Soldiers
from Fort Bliss and JRTC. One scenario consisted of two foreign nationals
pleading for medical assistance, trying to gain entry to D Btry’s
site. Spc. Christopher Laudermilk, the SOG at the time recalled, “We
had to keep a close eye on them and stay within the perimeter even though
they claimed to be friendly. They might have had improvised explosive
devises attached to them.”
Enemy aggressions were also fought off in the engagement control station
where air battles were fought. The launcher station crews were constantly
at work due to the myriad of targets on the ECS scope.
“They loaded the launchers about six times, throughout the night,
in Mission Oriented Protective Posture level four, while singing cadences
to fuel their battle rhythm,” said Sgt. Casey Williams, E Btry.,
who provided security for the reload teams.
Considering the battalion’s area of operation (ultimately from
south McGregor Range to northeast Otero Mesa) was so vast, the effective
flow of communication was the highest priority. In order to sustain
the continuous exchange of reports and intelligence, various forms of
communication were employed. Single-Channel Ground and Airborne Systems,
UHF, Switch Multiplexor Units, iridium satellite phones, SECTRA phones,
Motorola trunking radios, Tactical Local Area Network systems, and three
communication relay groups moving at various times all provided successful
communications.
A wounded foreign national tries to gain entrance to D Battery’s
site.
“We jumped
five times in order to maintain the relay of voice and data information,”
said Spc. Stephen Brown, a headquarter battery Soldier working at CRG
four.
After 10 days in the field, the AMDTC culminated with a Patriot live-fire.
Five missiles were shot from B, C, and D Btrys. intercepting simulated
air breathing targets. It was the first time seeing the full strength
of the weapon system for some. Aranda, newly from AIT said, “Instructors
at AIT tell how they’ve seen malfunctions, and it was nice to
see the missiles fire the way they are supposed to, and hit their target."
Combat lifesavers treat a wounded Soldier separated from his element.